To answer this, many other questions
show up. What does the term “mathematics” encompass? How could we know it is
one or the other? Mathematics is defined as the “abstract science of number,
quantity and space” (Oxford Dictionary). There are two major fields within it:
pure and applied mathematics. Applied mathematics allows people to use concepts
learned in that area in other subjects (physics, engineering, etc.), whereas
pure mathematics is studied “alone” solely using it for its own field. Defining
the term is important since we need to know what it means to reach a conclusion
about it. It is especially significant in this case because, quantum physics is
a part of the answer and it uses applied mathematics. Since the definition of
mathematics includes the word “abstract” (at least the definition I am using to
answer the question) an important part of reaching a conclusion will be
accepting that the answer might not be concrete.
Having defined the term, quantum
physics is another subject area that is crucial to look at. Humans categorize
things, we are the ones that make up measurements and these are only there
because we are making observations. If we were to remove all humans from Earth,
would there still be patterns and quantities? Since we are the ones that
classify and group what we see and determine whether something is bigger or
smaller, if we were removed from Earth these attributions would no longer
exist. The size of an object might not change but the idea of it being bigger
than another one will no longer be present. This is due to the fact that there
will be no one making an observation and that is a great part of quantum
physics. Quantum physics/mechanics says it is possible for something to be in
multiple places at the same time. This can be exemplified with an experiment
with light, when light is reflected through two small openings, that light,
even though it is a microscopic beam, will pass through both openings, not only
one, which is similar to the process of photosynthesis (How Long is a Piece of
String). In the documentary where this information is presented, another
example is presented later, with a cat. The professor shows a stuffed cat and
asks whether it is dead or alive, the obvious answer would be dead but he says
it is both. Supposing it was killed by poison in its milk, since the particles
of that poison could be in different places at the same time, it could be in
the milk and could be elsewhere, leading to the cat being both alive and dead.
The professor followed to state the only reason we conclude it is dead is
because we are there to make that observation. Thus, if there were no humans to
say that the cat is dead, it would be both alive and dead.
What we notice in these examples is
that we create categories as we make observations, therefore seemingly
“inventing” mathematics. However, both experiments show that without the
observations there is still the principle of quantum physics, thus supposedly
showing it is there without our presence. Since quantum physics uses applied
mathematics, this could suggest that the latter was discovered. The experiments
allow us to create a paradigm, how is math discovered and invented? What we can
see is that certain aspects of math might have been created since they wouldn’t
exist without the presence of a human being, on the other hand, there are
aspects that are found, since they would exist if we didn’t. These ideas go
back to the definition of mathematics, the fact that it is abstract.
Having taken all of that into
consideration, we should go back to the initial question. Can we know if
mathematics is invented or discovered? The question does not ask which one it
is, instead it asks whether it is possible to determine that or not. There are
many experiments that might lead to one direction or another, but to know
whether it was invented or discovered, it seems like the best way is imagining
how the world would be without our interference. However, there is a downfall,
to what extent can we imagine it how it would really be. All we can do is think
that it would stay the same, because that is all we know, but the world might
be different without living things in it. Thus, we can try to reach conclusions
based on some assumptions we make but we cannot really determine whether
mathematics is invented or discovered since to know that we would have to be
inexistent. It could be a mixture of both, as it seems with the experiments,
but that conclusion is based on certain assumptions we make to be able to
create a theory. Thus, I don’t think we can know for sure.
Works Cited
BBC. "How Long Is a Piece of String? - Full
Documentary." YouTube. YouTube, 13 Apr. 2013. Web. 15 Apr.
2014. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=231AKaNr1AY>.
"Definition of Mathematics in
English." Oxford Dictionaries. Oxford University Press, n.d.
Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
<http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/mathematics>.
Keim, Brandon. Plantburst. Digital
image. Wired. Wired Science, 07 July 2010. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
<http://www.wired.com/2010/07/leafy-green-physics/>.
Bel, you have come up with the right knowledge questions and are looking in the right places to find answers. I'm really pleased with your progress and competence here. You're also learning to write with more focus and clarity without losing complexity, which I know you've been working on. I'm especially pleased that you caught on to the wording of the question. What you should work on next in these posts is to continue to follow the distinctions you make, through the possibility and the evidence, all the way to implications. For example, you did a nice job of suggesting that perhaps we don't have to say math is either invented or discovered, but perhaps different aspects of it meet the criteria of one and other aspects meet the other. Keep chasing that down until it's finished. What could account for this? and finally, Who cares? Anyway, overall you've written a really good response. Nice work.
ReplyDelete